The following guidelines come from a deep analysis of case studies, norms and regulations, in relation to the local level. This analysis is summarized in a card that can be downloaded in Italian language.
Vegetation can be an effective tool for the control of
environmental and microclimatic conditions of indoor and outdoor space, thanks
to the many systems available on the market; these allows to combine nature and
urban fabric operating on façades and roofs. Green roofs are commonly
classified in: intensive, semi-intensive and extensive solutions, which have
different uses, stratigraphy and vegetation; for every type of green roof
substrate thickness (given by the plant species used), maintenance needed,
system weight, microclimatic benefits obtainable, influence on architectural
aesthetic, costs, and use are different. Starting from a simple disposition of
climbing plants at the base of the façade, several systems are available for
vertical green. These are made by supporting structures for the growth of
climbing plants or planter boxes placed at several heights with a shading
function; others provide the possibility to cultivate species naturally not
suitable for growing on vertical surfaces, thanks to the disposition of
pre-vegetated panels, defined as living wall systems. Greening the building envelope allows to create better
microclimatic and environmental conditions, reducing also the effects of
climate changes. The integration of green façades and roofs at the building
scale entails a reduction of resources due to a possible improvement of the
building envelope thermal behaviour (cooling capacity, insulation, thermal
mass); at a larger scale vegetation allows to mitigate the urban heat island
phenomenon, which is responsible of dis-comfort situations and consequently of
high energy consumption for air-conditioning, relevant aspect in the
Mediterranean climate. Vegetation contributes to an air quality improvement,
with respect to fine dust and pollutant gases (CO2, NO2,
and SO2) absorption, with positive effects also on the quality of
indoor environments.
The difficulty of building integration of vertical and
horizontal greening systems depends on several factors; considering the
environmental and microclimatic benefits described, it is recommended the overtaking
of these difficulties, which is often not very complex. These difficulties can
be caused by a restricted diffusion of greening systems (and by the resulting
preconception with respect to maintenance and economic burden), by insufficient
clearness of the local regulations on the microclimatic and environmental
benefits obtainable and on the plants species parameters of choice. The reduced
diffusion of this technology is also due to the absence of economic supporting
programs or specific regulation aimed to support a wider diffusion in urban
areas. Finally, as it can be deduced from ALLEGATO NORMA 3-4, the local
regulations don’t give specific indications with respect to interventions on
historical contexts, leading large space to either positive or negative
interpretations of controlling bodies.
The diffusion in the local context of green building envelopes for the environmental and microclimatic control, considering the weakness defined, could be implemented thanks to the following actions:
Indication for the Bio-construction Action Plan
Pursuant to the guidelines written above, here are synthetically reported the criteria/examples for pilot projects to be financed in MED territory, in relation with the specific treated theme. These criteria/examples, together with the ones resulting from all the themes of eco-construction tool matrix, will make up a Bio-construction Action Plan for each partner countries.
Possible criteria for MED bio–housing quality certificate
Usually the certification tools
provided by the main organizations don’t directly consider vertical or
horizontal greening systems. In any case under many headings (and relative
points) it is considered that the integration of vegetation, as it happens for
LEED Italia and Itaca Protocol, the Italian version of “Green Building
Challenge” (made by a network of 25 countries), which are two of the most
diffused and known Italian rating systems. For example, with the Itaca
Protocol, the integration of vegetation (green roofs and ground treatment with
vegetation in the vicinity of the building) can be considered for the calculation
of only two standards. In the part regarding the environmental burden the
performance indicator of the urban heat island criterion (category: environmental impact) is calculated
with the relation between shaded or greened surfaces and the total surface of
the intervention parcel (external area + roofs); in the same rating field also
the criterion related to the ground permeability is calculated considering the
presence of vegetation in the project area, even if, for this parameters, roofs
are not taken into account. Also, inside LEED, vertical greening systems are
not mentioned, but green roofs are considered for several parameters regarding
the intervention site sustainability. Green roofs and vegetation on the ground
can be considered for the site development (habitat protection and restoration,
open space maximization), for the qualitative and quantitative rainwater
management, and for the mitigation of urban heat island.
The
effects of vegetation on the building microclimate are several; these could be
considered in certification systems. Some of the effects are still not
quantified, however it is believed that more space could be given to greening
systems and especially to vertical green (which is not mentioned in any of the
examples given) for the many advantages that these systems offer.
The case studies relative to “Microclimatic and environmental control through vegetation” are given inside the card that can be downloaded from the SCORE web site in Italian language.